The Public Management of Risk: Separating Ex Ante and Ex Post Monitors
35 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2010
Date Written: December 1, 2010
Abstract
When a firm undertakes risky activities, the conflict between social and private incentives to implement safety care requires public intervention which can take the form of both monetary incentives but also ex ante or ex post monitoring, i.e., before or after an accident occurs. We delineate the optimal scope of monitoring depending on whether public monitors are benevolent or corruptible. We show that separating the ex ante and the ex post monitors increases the likelihood of ex post investigation, helps prevent capture and improves welfare.
Keywords: Risk Regulation, Monitoring, Capture, Integration, Separation
JEL Classification: L51, D82
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Modeling the Choice between Regulation and Liability in Terms of Social Welfare
By Marcel Boyer and Donatella Porrini
-
Judgment Proofness Under Four Different Precaution Technologies
-
The Limitations of Legal Institutions for Addressing Environmental Risks
-
The Joint Use of Regulation and Strict Liability with Multidimensional Care and Uncertain Conviction
By Bharat Bhole and Jeffrey Wagner
-
Soft Negligence and Cause in Fact: A Comment on Ganuza and Gomez
-
The Public Management of Environmental Risk: Separating Ex Ante and Ex Post Monitors
By Jérôme Pouyet, Yolande Hiriart, ...