Court-Connected Arbitration in the Superior Court of Arizona: A Study of its Performance and Proposed Rule Changes

Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 1, p. 65, 2007

35 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2010 Last revised: 16 Dec 2010

Roselle Wissler

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Bob Dauber

Arizona State University (ASU)

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

This article reports the findings of an empirical study of arbitration in Arizona's general jurisdiction civil trial courts. The study found that the arbitration program's primary goals of providing faster and less expensive resolution of cases, reducing the court's workload, and maintaining or enhancing the satisfaction of users, were not entirely being met. Many cases did not meet arbitration deadlines and court case processing time standards. Most cases eligible for arbitration concluded before a hearing was held, and those cases that had a hearing seemed more likely to have been diverted from settlement than from trial. Consequently, the arbitration program was likely to affect the court's workload in a relatively small proportion of cases, was more likely to reduce the use of court pretrial rather than trial resources, and was unlikely to substantially reduce litigants' costs. But arbitration did increase access to a hearing on the merits. Lawyers who represented clients in arbitration had generally favorable assessments of the process and award, but expressed concerns about the adequacy of arbitrators’ knowledge of both substantive issues and arbitration procedures. A majority of lawyers favored retaining compulsory arbitration and some of its basic components but changing policies relating to arbitrator service and assignment. These findings, which were consistent with studies in other jurisdictions, suggest that court-connected arbitration does not have negative consequences, but also does not consistently or substantially improve the effectiveness and efficiency of dispute resolution.

Keywords: arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, empirical research

Suggested Citation

Wissler, Roselle and Dauber, Bob, Court-Connected Arbitration in the Superior Court of Arizona: A Study of its Performance and Proposed Rule Changes (2007). Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 1, p. 65, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1723215

Roselle Wissler (Contact Author)

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States

Bob Dauber

Arizona State University (ASU) ( email )

Farmer Building 440G PO Box 872011
Tempe, AZ 85287
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Rank
313,967
Abstract Views
1,016