Footnotes (86)



Taking Politics Seriously – But Not Too Seriously

Charles Blattberg

University of Montreal

August 4, 2015

Monist political philosophers such as John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin fail to take politics seriously enough. This is because they treat it as if it were a game. I begin by showing why we consider games frivolous and then show that Rawls’ theory of justice, in particular, is not merely analogous to a game, as he himself seems to claim, but is in fact a kind of game. As such, it is harmful to politics both as regards the citizens who would participate directly in it and those who would do no more than follow it. Similar harms, I then argue, come from taking politics too seriously, which is the attitude I ascribe to pluralist political philosophers such as Isaiah Berlin, Stuart Hampshire, and Bernard Williams. To them, the plural, incommensurable nature of values means that they cannot be reconciled and so that politics must be a matter of negotiating dirty, and often tragic, compromises. What we need instead, I conclude, is a third way, one that is neither monist nor pluralist but in-between the two extremes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Monism, Pluralism, John Rawls, Ronald Dworkin, Isaiah Berlin, Stuart Hampshire, Bernard Williams, Games, Gamification,Tragedy, Comedy, Ethics for/against Adversaries

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2010 ; Last revised: May 5, 2016

Suggested Citation

Blattberg, Charles, Taking Politics Seriously – But Not Too Seriously (August 4, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1723387 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1723387

Contact Information

Charles Blattberg (Contact Author)
University of Montreal ( email )
C.P. 6128 succursale Centre-ville
Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7
514-343-6111ex.40898 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,926
Downloads: 559
Download Rank: 37,070
Footnotes:  86