Public Administration and Development, Forthcoming
Posted: 18 Dec 2010
Date Written: August 1, 2010
In this paper, I assess the EITI a multisectoral partnership designed to help resource rich countries avoid corruption in the management of extractive industry revenues. Some 32 nations have adopted EITI, and the numbers of implementing nations are rapidly increasing. However, I hypothesize that the EITI partnership is not as effective as it could be for three reasons. First, the partners (governments, civil society, and business) have different visions of EITI. Second, some implementing governments have not allowed civil society to participate fully in the process or have not consistently provided civil society with the information they need to hold their governments to account. In this regard it is a limited partnership. Third, in many participating countries, the public and legislators may not be aware of EITI. Thus, although public participation is essential to the success and potential positive spillovers of EITI, the public is essentially a silent partner, limiting the ability of the EITI to succeed as a counterweight to corruption.
Keywords: EITI, extractives, corruption, civil society, anticorruption, access to information
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Aaronson , Susan Ariel, Limited Partnership: Business, Government, Civil Society and the Public in the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (August 1, 2010). Public Administration and Development, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1726173