Discounting for Climate Change
30 Pages Posted: 18 Dec 2010
There are 2 versions of this paper
Discounting for Climate Change
Date Written: 2009
Abstract
It is well-known that the discount rate is crucially important for estimating the social cost of carbon, a standard indicator for the seriousness of climate change and desirable level of climate policy. The Ramsey equation for the discount rate has three components: the pure rate of time preference, a measure of relative risk aversion, and the rate of growth of per capita consumption. Much of the attention on the appropriate discount rate for long-term environmental problems has focussed on the role played by the pure rate of time preference in this formulation. We show that the other two elements are numerically just as important in considerations of anthropogenic climate change. The elasticity of the marginal utility with respect to consumption is particularly important because it assumes three roles: consumption smoothing over time, risk aversion, and inequity aversion. Given the large uncertainties about climate change and widely asymmetric impacts, the assumed rates of risk and inequity version can be expected to play significant roles. The consumption growth rate plays four roles. It is one of the determinants of the discount rate, and one of the drivers of emissions and hence climate change. We find that the impacts of climate change grow slower than income, so that the effective discount rate is higher than the real discount rate. The differential growth rate between rich and poor countries determines the time evolution of the size of the equity weights. As there are a number of crucial but uncertain parameters, it is no surprise that one can obtain almost any estimate of the social cost of carbon. We even show that, for a low pure rate of time preference, the estimate of the social cost of carbon is indeed arbitrary – as one can exclude neither large positive nor large negative impacts in the very long run. However, if we probabilistically constrain the parameters to values that are implied by observed behaviour, we find that the social cost of carbon, corrected for uncertainty and inequity, is 61 US dollar per metric tonne of carbon.
Keywords: Social cost of carbon, climate change, pure time preference, risk aversion, inequity aversion, income elasticity, time horizon, uncertainty
JEL Classification: Q54
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Equity Weighting and the Marginal Damage Costs of Climate Change
By David Anthoff, Cameron J. Hepburn, ...
-
On the Importance of Equity in International Climate Policy: An Empirical Analysis
By Andreas Lange, Carsten Vogt, ...
-
AD-DICE: An Implementation of Adaptation in the DICE Mode
By Kelly C. De Bruin, Rob Dellink, ...
-
Cooperation in International Environmental Negotiations Due to a Preference for Equity
By Andreas Lange and Carsten Vogt
-
Equity and Justice in Global Warming Policy
By Snorre Kverndokk and Adam Rose
-
The Polluter Pays Principle and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate Change: An Application of Fund
-
On the Self-Serving Use of Equity Principles in International Climate Negotiations
By Andreas Lange, Andreas Löschel, ...
-
On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations
By Andreas Lange, Andreas Löschel, ...
-
The Impact of Equity-Preferences on the Stability of Heterogeneous International Agreements
