The Impact of Sas No. 82 on Perceptions of External Auditor Responsibility for Fraud Detection
16 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2010
Date Written: September 1, 2003
Abstract
This study evaluates whether perceptions of external auditor responsibility to detect fraud in US financial statement audits are greater under Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 82 than under the superseded SAS No. 53. A series of four fraud vignettes were evaluated by external auditors, internal auditors, and fraud examiners who were either given a summary of the new standard or the old standard to assess auditor fraud detection responsibilities. The vignettes manipulated fraud materiality and fraud type (i.e. fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets) within?subject. The results provide consistent evidence that perceptions of external auditor responsibility to detect fraud are higher under SAS No. 82 than under SAS No. 53. In addition, the results indicate that the external auditors' perceptions increased more than the perceptions of the internal auditors and fraud examiners. Finally, the findings revealed that while all participant groups were sensitive to fraud materiality, only the external auditors were sensitive to fraud type.
Keywords: fraud detection, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 53, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 82, external auditors, internal auditors, fraud examiners, Auditing Standards Board, materiality
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
The Impact of Sas No. 82 on Perceptions of External Auditor Responsibility for Fraud Detection
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $42.00 .
File name: 1099-1123.pdf
Size: 185K
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.
