Framing Social Security Reform: Behavioral Responses to Changes in the Full Retirement Age
59 Pages Posted: 22 Dec 2010
There are 2 versions of this paper
Framing Social Security Reform: Behavioral Responses to Changes in the Full Retirement Age
Date Written: December 1, 2010
Abstract
We use a US Social Security reform as a quasi-experiment to provide evidence on framing effects in retirement behavior. The reform increased the full retirement age (FRA) from 65 to 66 in two month increments per year of birth for cohorts born from 1938 to 1943. We find strong evidence that the spike in the benefit claiming hazard at 65 moved in lockstep along with the FRA. Results on self-reported retirement and exit from employment are less clear-cut, but go in the same direction. The responsiveness to the new FRA is stronger for people with higher cognitive skills. We interpret the findings as evidence of reference dependence with loss aversion. We develop a simple labor supply model with reference dependence that can explain the results. The model has potentially important implications for framing of future Social Security reforms.
JEL Classification: J26
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Framing Social Security Reform: Behavioral Responses to Changes in the Full Retirement Age
By Luc Behaghel and David M. Blau
-
Social Norms, Rules of Thumb, and Retirement: Evidence for Rationality in Retirement Planning
-
Labor Market Rigidities and the Employment Behavior of Older Workers
By David M. Blau and Tetyana Shvydko
-
Framing Effects and Expected Social Security Claiming Behavior
By Jeffrey R. Brown, Arie Kapteyn, ...
-
Framing Effects and Expected Social Security Claiming Behavior
By Jeffrey R. Brown, Arie Kapteyn, ...
-
Saving Shortfalls and Delayed Retirement
By Andrew Au, Olivia S. Mitchell, ...
-
By Wojciech Kopczuk and Jae Song