30 Pages Posted: 3 Jan 2011
This study examined whether explicit and implicit biases in favor of Whites and against Asian Americans would alter evaluation of a litigator''s deposition. We found evidence of both explicit bias as measured by self-reports, and implicit bias as measured by two Implicit Association Tests. In particular, explicit stereotypes that the ideal litigator was White predicted worse evaluation of the Asian American litigator (out group derogation); by contrast, implicit stereotypes predicted preferential evaluation of the White litigator (in group favoritism). In sum, participants were not colorblind, at least implicitly, toward even a "model minority", and these biases produced racial discrimination. This study provides further evidence of the predictive and ecological validity of the Implicit Association Test in a legal domain.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kang, Jerry and Dasgupta, Nilanjana and Yogeeswaran, Kumar and Blasi, Gary, Are Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 886-915, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1733794 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01199.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: j-1461.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.