High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations: Re-Investigating the Evidence from Bangladesh
41 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2011
Date Written: January 6, 2011
Abstract
Recently, microfinance has come under increasing criticism raising questions of the validity of iconic studies which have justified the microfinance phenomenon. This paper applies propensity score matching (PSM), which has become widely used for the analysis of observational data, to the study by Pitt and Khandker (1998) which has been labelled the most rigorous evidence supporting claims that microfinance benefits the poorest especially when targeted on women. After carefully reconstructing the data we differentiate outcomes by gender of borrower, take account of borrowing from several formal and informal sources, and find that the mainly positive impacts of microfinance that we observe are shown by sensitivity analysis to be highly vulnerable to selection on unobservables, and we are therefore not convinced that the relationships between microfinance and outcomes are causal.
Keywords: Microfinance, Impact Evaluation, Propensity Score Matching, Sensitivity Analysis, Bangladesh
JEL Classification: C10, C31, O12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Are Immigrant Remittance Flows a Source of Capital for Development?
By Ralph Chami, Connel Fullenkamp, ...
-
The Optimal Migration Duration and Activity Choice after Re-Migration