Jockeying for Position: Strategic High School Choice Under Texas' Top Ten Percent Plan
39 Pages Posted: 10 Jan 2011 Last revised: 12 Jan 2025
Date Written: January 2011
Abstract
Beginning in 1998, all students in the state of Texas who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes were guaranteed admission to any in-state public higher education institution, including the flagships. While the goal of this policy is to improve college access for disadvantaged and minority students, the use of a school-specific standard to determine eligibility could have unintended consequences. Students may increase their chances of being in the top ten percent by choosing a high school with lower-achieving peers. Our analysis of students' school transitions between 8th and 10th grade three years before and after the policy change reveals that this incentive influences enrollment choices in the anticipated direction. Among the subset of students with both motive and opportunity for strategic high school choice, as many as 25 percent enroll in a different high school to improve the chances of being in the top ten percent. Strategic students tend to choose the neighborhood high school in lieu of more competitive magnet schools and, regardless of own race, typically displace minority students from the top ten percent pool. The net effect of strategic behavior is to slightly decrease minority students' representation in the pool.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit
By Nada Eissa and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum
-
By V. Joseph Hotz and John Karl Scholz
-
The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Labor Supply of Married Couples
-
Financial Incentives for Increasing Work and Income Among Low-Income Families
By Rebecca M. Blank, David Card, ...
-
Making Single Mothers Work: Recent Tax and Welfare Policy and its Effects
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum