The Supreme Fiction: Fiction or Fact?

Gregory Brazeal

Cornell University


Journal of Modern Literature, Vol. 31, pp. 80-100, 2007

The article makes a case for giving up the quest to identify Wallace Stevens’ “supreme fiction.” The poet hoped to usher in the creation of an idea that would serve as a fictive replacement for the idea of God, known to be fictive but willfully believed. His hope has remained unfulfilled. By the poet’s own explicit standards, the supreme fiction does not appear in any of his poems, nor in his poetry as a whole, nor in poetry in general. The very idea of a supreme fiction may depend, at least in part, upon a problematic conception of belief drawn from a popular misreading of William James’ “The Will to Believe.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Wallace Stevens, supreme fiction, will to believe, religious belief, poetry

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 12, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Brazeal, Gregory, The Supreme Fiction: Fiction or Fact? (2007). Journal of Modern Literature, Vol. 31, pp. 80-100, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1738590

Contact Information

Gregory Brazeal (Contact Author)
Cornell University ( email )
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,728
Downloads: 183
Download Rank: 125,062