Footnotes (41)



American Needle and Justice Stevens’ Supreme Court Antitrust Legacy

Warren S. Grimes

Southwestern Law School

December 1, 2010

Journal of Competition Law, Vol. 4, p. 430, 2010
Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1126

Justice John Paul Stevens last antitrust opinion, American Needle Inc. v. NFL, is important for its clarification of Sherman Act conspiracy doctrine. By recognizing that the conduct of joint ventures or partially integrated firms can still constitute a conspiracy, the decision preserves the reach of Section 1 of the Sherman Act as the primary tool for maintaining competition. The decision also provides a fitting opportunity for an assessment of Stevens’ role in shaping US antitrust jurisprudence. In contrast to many recent Court decisions that have ignored the facts of the dispute to declaim sweeping policy-oriented changes to US antitrust law, Justice Stevens’ opinion demonstrates that the Court is still capable of acting as a traditional judicial tribunal, deciding cases narrowly on their facts. This cautious and fact-anchored jurisprudence is a hallmark of Justice Stevens’ opinions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Antitrust Law, Sherman Act, Conspiracy Doctrine, Justice Stevens, Supreme Court

JEL Classification: K21, L41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 12, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Grimes, Warren S., American Needle and Justice Stevens’ Supreme Court Antitrust Legacy (December 1, 2010). Journal of Competition Law, Vol. 4, p. 430, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1738663 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1738663

Contact Information

Warren S. Grimes (Contact Author)
Southwestern Law School ( email )
3050 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 755
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 203,723
Footnotes:  41