Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Politics of Social Policy in America: The Causes and Effects of Indirect Versus Direct Social Spending

The Journal of Politics, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 74-83, January 2011

10 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2011  

Christopher G. Faricy

Washington State University

Date Written: January 1, 2011

Abstract

The United States has a divided social system in that both the public and private sectors provide citizens with benefits and services. The effects of political party control on public social policy are widely known. An area of study less understood is how partisanship influences private social benefits. I develop and test a theory that political parties' choice between indirect and direct social expenditures is primarily motivated by a desire to alter the balance between public and private power in society. First, I find no statistically conclusive evidence that Democratic control of the federal government results in higher levels of total social spending. Additionally, my results show that Republican control of the legislature results in a higher ratio of indirect to direct social spending. These results have implications for determining the beneficiaries of social benefits and economic inequality.

Suggested Citation

Faricy, Christopher G., The Politics of Social Policy in America: The Causes and Effects of Indirect Versus Direct Social Spending (January 1, 2011). The Journal of Politics, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 74-83, January 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1740767

Christopher Faricy (Contact Author)

Washington State University ( email )

Wilson Rd.
College of Business
Pullman, WA 99164
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
700
Rank
29,239
Abstract Views
6,513