'Public Perception of Teachers' Sexual Misconduct: Does the Sex of the Teacher Make a Difference?

Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 142-146, 2010

6 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 2011 Last revised: 5 Dec 2012

See all articles by Kristina Frketic

Kristina Frketic

Independent

Patricia L. Easteal

University of Canberra - School of Law and Justice

Abstract

We first identified that in recent sexual misconduct matters, female teachers received lighter sentences than their male counterparts. Could this be a reflection of community attitudes that minimize the criminality of a female teacher having sexual relations with a male student who is under the age of consent? Research in sexual assault has shown that to some extent judges’ decision-making may be unconsciously and implicitly affected by gender and sex myths and in their assessment of harm. To test this explanation for the relative leniency in sentencing women teachers, we conducted a small ‘community’ survey. We found evidence of gendered views about sexual misconduct. There is increased likelihood that the conduct is regarded as more serious if the student is female given a perception that the female experiences more negative impacts. Greater blame is placed on a male teacher who has a sexual relationship with a female student.

Keywords: Sexual misconduct, attitudes about sexual misconduct, gender differences

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Frketic, Kristina and Easteal, Patricia L., 'Public Perception of Teachers' Sexual Misconduct: Does the Sex of the Teacher Make a Difference?. Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 142-146, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1743942

Kristina Frketic

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Patricia L. Easteal (Contact Author)

University of Canberra - School of Law and Justice ( email )

Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
721
rank
301,233
PlumX Metrics