Al Maqaleh v. Gates

American Journal of International Law, Vol. 104, No. 4, 2010

UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 11-03

13 Pages Posted: 23 Jan 2011  

Kal Raustiala

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: January 20, 2011

Abstract

Does the constitutional right to habeas corpus reach to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan? In Boumediene v. Bush, the Supreme Court held that noncitizens detained at the American naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba could avail themselves of the constitutional right of habeas corpus. In Al Maqaleh v. Gates the DC Circuit faced the same question with regard to Bagram, and ruled that Bagram, while also an offshore American military base, was not analogous to Guantanamo with regard to habeas rights. This brief essay describes the case and analyzes its significance in light of the larger debates over the conflict in Afghanistan and against al Qaeda.

Keywords: constitutional rights of detained non-citizens, conflict in Afganistan, Bagram Air Base

Suggested Citation

Raustiala, Kal, Al Maqaleh v. Gates (January 20, 2011). American Journal of International Law, Vol. 104, No. 4, 2010; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 11-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1744334

Kal Raustiala (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-794-4856 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
174
Rank
138,114
Abstract Views
848