Profiles of Discrimination: A Critical Argument Against Racial Profiling

Sortuz: Onati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, Vol. 1, Forthcoming

14 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2011 Last revised: 30 Mar 2011

See all articles by Marco Goldoni

Marco Goldoni

University of Glasgow - Faculty of Law & Financial Studies

Date Written: January 25, 2011

Abstract

Racial profiling has become a common, but still largely ignored practice in Europe. This paper intends to put forward an argument against its legitimacy. In order to do this, the paper first tackles the problem of the definition of racial profiling. Then, by resorting to some of the main tenets of Critical Race Theory, it criticizes two of the most influential justifications of racial profiling. By adapting the idea that law is part and parcel of the process which creates racial categories, a critical argument for explicitly forbidding racial profiling is put forward. The last section deals with the question of legal remedies and it points to some of the difficulties that laws against racial profiling might have to face.

Keywords: Racial Profiling, Critical Race Theory, Racial Discrimination, Colour Blindness

Suggested Citation

Goldoni, Marco, Profiles of Discrimination: A Critical Argument Against Racial Profiling (January 25, 2011). Sortuz: Onati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, Vol. 1, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1747745

Marco Goldoni (Contact Author)

University of Glasgow - Faculty of Law & Financial Studies ( email )

Glasgow, Scotland
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/law/staff/marcogoldoni/#tabs=0

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
Abstract Views
1,118
rank
178,474
PlumX Metrics