Conglomeration Versus Strategic Focus: Evidence from the Insurance Industry
July 1999
48 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2000
Date Written: Working Paper No. 99-29
Abstract
We provide evidence on the validity of the conglomeration hypothesis versus the strategic focus hypothesis for financial institutions using data on U.S. insurance companies. We distinguish between the hypotheses using profit scope economies, which measures the relative efficiency of joint versus specialized production, taking both costs and revenues into account. The results suggest that the conglomeration hypothesis dominates for some types of financial service providers and the strategic focus hypothesis dominates for other types. This may explain the empirical puzzle of why joint producers and specialists both appear to be competitively viable in the long run.
JEL Classification: G22, G28, G34, L23, L89
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By J David Cummins and Mary A. Weiss
-
The Integration of the Financial Services Industry: Where are the Efficiencies?
-
Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from the Spanish Insurance Industry
By J David Cummins and María Rubio-misas
-
By J David Cummins and Xiaoying Xie
-
The Capital Structure of Firms Subject to Price Regulation: Evidence from the Insurance Industry
By Robert W. Klein, Richard D. Phillips, ...
-
Effects of Regulation on Utility Financing: Theory and Evidence
-
Rate Regulation and the Industrial Organization of Automobile Insurance