Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Law of Religious Liberty in a Tolerant Society

32 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2011 Last revised: 7 Mar 2011

Brian Leiter

University of Chicago

Date Written: January 25, 2011

Abstract

This is a draft of the final chapter of my forthcoming book WHY TOLERATE RELIGION? Earlier versions of material in the first part of the book appear on SSRN as "Why Tolerate Religion?" (Constitutional Commentary, 2008) and "Foundations of Religious Liberty: Toleration or Respect?" (San Diego Law Review, 2010) (the account of religion has changed somewhat since these two papers). The two main conclusions from earlier in the book that are presupposed in this draft chapter are that: (1) the moral value of liberty of conscience is not specific to claims of "religious" conscience; and (2) there are claims of conscience that are not "religious" in character (however precisely religion is understood). "Principled toleration" requires that a dominant group, with the means to stamp out or repress disfavored beliefs of others, nonetheless recognize that there are good moral reasons to permit such beliefs to be held and expressed (subject to the limits imposed by the Harm Principle). The draft chapter explores the question: what should become of the law of religious liberty in light of these conclusions? Should we opt for a scheme of universal exemptions for claims of conscience, or are there reasons to think that no exemptions for claims of conscience, religious or otherwise, are justified? The relation between toleration and religious establishment is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

Leiter, Brian, The Law of Religious Liberty in a Tolerant Society (January 25, 2011). U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 343. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1748699 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1748699

Brian Leiter (Contact Author)

University of Chicago ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
604
Rank
35,655
Abstract Views
4,857