Same-Sex Marriage, Second-Class Citizenship, and Law’s Social Meanings

78 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2011 Last revised: 31 Aug 2020

Date Written: January 28, 2011

Abstract

Government acts, statements, and symbols that carry the social meaning of second-class citizenship may, as a consequence of that fact, violate the Establishment Clause or the constitutional requirement of equal protection. Yet social meaning is often contested. Do laws permitting same-sex couples to form civil unions but not to enter "marriages" convey the social meaning that gays and lesbians are second-class citizens, as some courts have held? Do official displays of the Confederate battle flag unconstitutionally convey support for slavery and white supremacy? Different audiences reach different conclusions about the meaning of these and other contested statements and symbols. Accordingly, to implement the existing cross-ideological consensus that the Constitution forbids at least some government acts, statements, and symbols that convey the social meaning of second-class citizenship, one needs some method for selecting the relevant audience. No method is perfect, but this Article tentatively advances a "reasonable victim" perspective as the presumptive starting point for constitutional analysis.

Suggested Citation

Dorf, Michael C., Same-Sex Marriage, Second-Class Citizenship, and Law’s Social Meanings (January 28, 2011). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1267, 2011, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-03, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1750354 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1750354

Michael C. Dorf (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/faculty/bio.cfm?id=333

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
270
Abstract Views
3,632
rank
136,277
PlumX Metrics