Conceptual Hierarchies in Comparative Research: The Case of Democracy

CONCEPTS AND METHOD IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCE: THE TRADITION OF GIOVANNI SARTORI, David Collier, John Gerring, eds., Routledge, 2009

20 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2011  

David Collier

University of California, Berkeley - Department of Political Science

Steven Levitsky

Harvard University

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

Both kind hierarchies and part-whole hierarchies play an important role in the conceptual structure of comparative research, and understanding these hierarchies yields great insight into concept-formation. This article demonstrates the role of these two kinds of hierarchies in comparative studies of political democracies. Five patterns of conceptual innovation are identified: (1) moving down the kind hierarchy to classical subtypes of democracy and (2) moving up that hierarchy to classical subtypes of regime; (3) creating diminished subtypes within the framework of a part-whole hierarchy; (4a) shifting the overarching concept as a means of lowering the standard and, relatedly, (4b) shifting the overarching concept to raise the standard for democracy; and (5) precising the definition of democracy by adding defining attributes.

Suggested Citation

Collier, David and Levitsky, Steven, Conceptual Hierarchies in Comparative Research: The Case of Democracy (2009). CONCEPTS AND METHOD IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCE: THE TRADITION OF GIOVANNI SARTORI, David Collier, John Gerring, eds., Routledge, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1750505

David Collier (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - Department of Political Science ( email )

210 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Steven Levitsky

Harvard University ( email )

1875 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
478
rank
54,156
Abstract Views
1,039
PlumX