Drafting a European Constitution Challenges and Opportunitites

ConWEB Online - Constitutionalism Web Papers, University of Manchester School of Law No. 4

27 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2011

Date Written: January 31, 2011

Abstract

These reflections address two tasks prompted by current controversies concerning whether the EU needs a written constitution. Normative considerations do not seem to require a constitution now - nor does such a constitution appear illegitimate in principle, hence it is normatively permissible in principle. Secondly, the Convention is called and composed in such a way as to exacerbate some risks, while reducing others, with ramifications for the legitimacy of the process and the normative quality of any resulting document. In particular, arguments must be provided both in favour and against centralisation of competences, to facilitate their best allocation. Given the participation of centralisation-prone institutions such as the European Parliament, the inclusion of national parliaments is welcome. Yet a disinterested stance is less likely insofar as many of the institutions are represented at the Convention, and especially insofar as an all-out crisis does not loom large. Bargaining solely for own institutional advantage is tempting, yet the credibility of the result requires that the institutions secure justice among Europeans – and not least: that the institutions are seen to be so secured. A central challenge is to foster within the Convention a general and public attitude of commitment to β€œthe European interest.” This counts in favour of public scrutiny of the process, even though such transparency may constrain drastic and creative restructuring. Transparency may prevent anything more than incremental tinkering – but that may be sufficient, and all that may reasonably be expected.

Keywords: European constitution, EU, Convention, European Parliament (EP), Transparency

Suggested Citation

Follesdal, Andreas, Drafting a European Constitution Challenges and Opportunitites (January 31, 2011). ConWEB Online - Constitutionalism Web Papers, University of Manchester School of Law No. 4. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1752163 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1752163

Andreas Follesdal (Contact Author)

Pluricourts ( email )

P.O. Box 6706
St. Olavs plass 5
0130 Oslo
Norway

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
66
rank
332,374
Abstract Views
562
PlumX Metrics