Returns to Type or Tenure?
CentER Discussion Paper No. 2011-001
24 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2011
There are 2 versions of this paper
Date Written: January 1, 2011
Abstract
A regression of wages on firm tenure is likely to yield biased estimates of the returns to tenure because tenure and wages are confounded by unobserved attributes of the job and the unobserved quality of the match between the firm and the employee. Previously, the within-job variation in tenure has been used as an instrument to estimate the average returns to tenure. In this paper, we propose to use instead an easy-to-implement control function estimator for the returns to tenure and their dependence on unobserved heterogeneity. The obtained results for Germany indicate that there is a substantial amount of unobserved heterogeneity in the returns to tenure and that good job matches are characterized by higher returns to tenure in the first five years and lower returns thereafter.
Keywords: Wage growth, returns to tenure, selection on unobservables, control function approach, nonseparable model
JEL Classification: J31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Specific Capital, Mobility, and Wages: Wages Rise with Job Seniority
-
Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men
By Robert H. Topel and Michael P. Ward