Branding a Merger: Implications for Merger Valuation and Future Performance

51 Pages Posted: 11 Feb 2011 Last revised: 31 Mar 2019

See all articles by Isaac M. Dinner

Isaac M. Dinner

Indeed

Jonathan Knowles

Type 2 Consulting

Natalie Mizik

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill; University of Washington

Eugene Pavlov

University of Miami

Date Written: January 18, 2019

Abstract

The choice of post-merger corporate branding is a major strategic decision. It serves as a signal about the positioning and strategic intent of the new merged entity to the key stakeholders—customers, employees, and investors—affecting their ensuing behavior. We investigate the financial markets reactions and future operating performance implications of this decision. We classify merger transactions into three groupings according to the post-merger corporate branding: assimilation (the identity of the target company is discarded and it is rebranded with the acquirer’s name and symbol), business-as-usual (both firms continue to operate under their own corporate names and symbols), and fusion (elements of both corporate brands are maintained in a new brand). We find significant differences in the merger valuation across branding strategies. The stock market reaction to fusion is more positive than to assimilation and business-as-usual-branded merger announcements. Our analyses of post-merger sales, operating costs, and survival rates help explain these differences in merger valuation. Our analyses address selection and endogeneity issues, allowing for a causal interpretation of these findings. They provide support for the “brand-is-an-asset” versus the “signaling” perspective on the role of brands. Interestingly, we also find that the well-documented M&A mis-pricing phenomenon is primarily driven by the business-as-usual-branded mergers.

Keywords: Corporate Branding, Mergers, Event Study, Calendar-Time Portfolio Analysis, Selection Bias, Treatment Effects Models, Endogenous Treatment Effects

JEL Classification: M31, G34

Suggested Citation

Dinner, Isaac M. and Knowles, Jonathan and Mizik, Natalie and Mizik, Natalie and Pavlov, Eugene, Branding a Merger: Implications for Merger Valuation and Future Performance (January 18, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1756368 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1756368

Isaac M. Dinner

Indeed ( email )

721 Domain Drive
Austin, TX 78758
United States

Jonathan Knowles

Type 2 Consulting ( email )

16 East 40th Street
Floor 13 Penthouse
New York, NY New York 10016
United States
2125379200 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.type2consulting.com

Natalie Mizik (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill ( email )

102 Ridge Road
Chapel Hill, NC NC 27514
United States

University of Washington ( email )

Seattle, WA 98195
United States

Eugene Pavlov

University of Miami ( email )

1320 S Dixie Hwy
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
679
Abstract Views
3,160
rank
55,584
PlumX Metrics