Do U.S. Insurance Firms Offer the 'Wrong' Incentives to Their Executives?
46 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2011 Last revised: 12 Apr 2011
Date Written: February 9, 2011
Abstract
We examine the relation between executive compensation and market-implied default risk for listed insurance firms from 1992-2007. Shareholders are expected to encourage managerial risk-sharing through equity-based incentive compensation. We find that long-term incentives and other share-based plans do not affect the default risk faced by firms. However, the extensive use of stock options leads to higher future default risk for insurance firms. We argue that this is because option-based incentives induce managerial risk-taking behavior, which seeks to maximize managerial payoff through equity volatility. This could be detrimental to the interests of shareholders, especially during a financial crisis.
Keywords: Executive Compensation, Default Risk, Risk Management, Insurance
JEL Classification: G22, G24, G32, G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Institutional Ownership Stability and Risk Taking: Evidence from the Life-Health Insurance Industry
By Jiang Cheng, Elyas Elyasiani, ...
-
Does Board Structure in Banks Really Affect Their Performance?
By Shams Pathan and Robert W. Faff
-
Risk-Taking and Performance of Public Insurers: An International Comparison
By Paige Fields, Manu Gupta, ...