Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Funding Race as Biology: The Relevance of ‘Race’ in Medical Research

44 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2011 Last revised: 6 Feb 2014

Taunya Lovell Banks

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

Most scientists agree that race and ethnicity (ethno-race) classifications are the result of social and political conditions, as opposed to biological differences. But there is disagreement about the scientific validity of these categories. A number of scientists use ethno-race as a surrogate for various socioeconomic and environmental factors. Using race as a “biological” category can reflect and reinforce racial stratification as well as racist notions of inherent human difference. Questions surrounding the appropriateness of ethno-race classifications in medical research have been heightened by two decades of federal legislation that contains initiatives on minority health.

This article proceeds from the assumption that conventional legal challenges to the inappropriate use of ethno-race in federally funded biomedical research are fraught with problems. Further, it argues that the current regulatory approach used by high impact medical journals and the federal government to discourage misuse of ethno-race comes too late. A more effective approach is stringent review and clearer standards about the use of ethno-face in biomedical research at the grant proposal stage.

Keywords: race, ethnicity, ethno-race, racial stratification, biology

Suggested Citation

Banks, Taunya Lovell, Funding Race as Biology: The Relevance of ‘Race’ in Medical Research (2011). 12 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 571, 2011; U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1760092

Taunya Lovell Banks (Contact Author)

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )

500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
408