Platform Pricing Structure and Moral Hazard
32 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2011 Last revised: 22 Nov 2012
There are 2 versions of this paper
Platform Pricing Structure and Moral Hazard
Platform Pricing Structure and Moral Hazard
Date Written: June 2012
Abstract
We study pricing by a monopoly platform that matches buyers and sellers in an environment with cross-market externalities. Said platform has no private information, does not set the commodity's price and can only charge trading parties for the transaction. Our innovation consists in introducing moral hazard on the sellers' side and an equilibrium notion of platform reputation in an infinite horizon model. With linear fees the platform can mitigate, but not eliminate, the loss of reputation induced by moral hazard. If lump-sum fees (registration fees) can be levied, moral hazard can be overcome. The upfront payment determines the participation threshold of sellers and extracts them, while (lower) transactions fees provide incentives for good behavior. This breaks the equivalence of lump-sum payments and linear fees (Rochet and Tirole (2006)). We draw implications for the role of subsidies (Caillaud and Jullien (2003)).
Keywords: Platforms, Two-Sided Markets, Reputation, Moral Hazard
JEL Classification: L11, L12, L14, L81, D21, D82
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
The Determinants of Optimal Interchange Fees in Payment Systems
-
The Determinants of Optimal Interchange Fees in Payment Systems
-
The Neutrality of Interchange Fees in Payment Systems
By Joshua S. Gans and Stephen P. King
-
Regulating Interchange Fees in Payment Systems
By Joshua S. Gans and Stephen P. King
-
Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts
By Mark Armstrong and Julian Wright
-
An Empirical Analysis of Payment Card Usage
By Marc Rysman
