Do we need a European 'National Market System'? Competition, Arbitrage, and Suboptimal Executions
44 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2011 Last revised: 5 May 2011
Date Written: May 3, 2011
Abstract
The introduction of the European Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) ended the quasi-monopoly of national exchanges in equity trading across Europe and many new trading platforms emerged. European trading venues are neither formally linked by technology nor does regulation enforce price-priority across platforms. This raises the question of market integration of fragmented markets. We find that quotes for UK blue chips are closely linked across trading venues and that a high fraction of trades is executed at best available prices. Our results suggest that competition forces competing but disconnected platforms to quote prices as if they were formally linked.
Keywords: Competition, Fragmentation, Market Quality, MiFID
JEL Classification: G10, G14, G18
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity?
By Terrence Hendershott, Charles M. Jones, ...
-
The Flash Crash: High-Frequency Trading in an Electronic Market
By Andrei A. Kirilenko, Albert S. Kyle, ...
-
By Joel Hasbrouck and Gideon Saar
-
Rise of the Machines: Algorithmic Trading in the Foreign Exchange Market
By Alain Chaboud, Ben Chiquoine, ...
-
Automation, Speed, and Stock Market Quality: The NYSE’s Hybrid
-
Equilibrium High Frequency Trading
By Thierry Foucault, Sophie Moinas, ...
-
Insiders-Outsiders, Transparency, and the Value of the Ticker
By Giovanni Cespa and Thierry Foucault
-
Insiders-Outsiders, Transparency and the Value of the Ticker
By Giovanni Cespa and Thierry Foucault