Without Prejudice Interpretation – With Prejudice Negotiations

Evidence and Proof, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2011

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 9/2011

10 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2011

Date Written: February 16, 2011

Abstract

It is well known that the rule that disallows extrinsic evidence to contradict, vary, add or subtract from the terms of a written contract cannot be taken at face value. Evidence may be given of the surrounding facts, the factual matrix, to explain the meaning of the written contract. This may include facts imparted by one party to another. Therefore, judges have to draw a difficult distinction between admissible material which forms part of the pre-contractual negotiations and material which forms part of the pre-contractual negotiations but which is not part of the factual matrix and is not therefore admissible for interpretation. In effect, any part of pre-contract negotiations which a reasonable bystander would regard as relevant to understanding the contract would be admissible for the purpose of interpretation. The recent UK Supreme Court decision in Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2010] UKSC 44, [2010] 4 All ER 101 held that a written contract resulting from “without prejudice” negotiations may be interpreted in the same way. This means that anything said during settlement discussions is admissible for the purpose of interpretation provided it is within the permissible factual matrix. It follows that settlement negotiations are now “without prejudice except for interpretation”, with the result that parties have to be much more careful about what they say in the course of settlement discussions.

Suggested Citation

Zuckerman, Adrian A. S., Without Prejudice Interpretation – With Prejudice Negotiations (February 16, 2011). Evidence and Proof, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2011; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 9/2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1762776

Adrian A. S. Zuckerman (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
Abstract Views
746
rank
230,588
PlumX Metrics