Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Privatization and Democratization - Reflections on the Power of Eminent Domain

St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 50, p. 751, 2006

Saint Louis U. Legal Studies Research Paper

9 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2011 Last revised: 23 Feb 2011

Peter W. Salsich

Saint Louis University - School of Law

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

This essay reflects on the continuing controversy over the use of eminent domain by local governments to foster economic development and Professor Carol Rose’s caution that privatization by itself does not guarantee success in democratic endeavors. The author examines the human element of eminent domain by discussing his experience as a member of a panel sponsored by a citizen’s advocacy group in St. Louis where he presented an analysis of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut. This essay concludes that Kelo served a useful purpose, reminding people that the appropriate decision maker concerning the use of eminent domain by local governments is the state legislature. Further, the article suggests that rather than an absolute prohibition of eminent domain in the economic development context, state legislatures can and should place prudent limits on its use.

Suggested Citation

Salsich, Peter W., Privatization and Democratization - Reflections on the Power of Eminent Domain (2006). St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 50, p. 751, 2006; Saint Louis U. Legal Studies Research Paper . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1763831

Peter W. Salsich (Contact Author)

Saint Louis University - School of Law ( email )

100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63101
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
297