Coercion and Public Justification

Colin Bird

affiliation not provided to SSRN

March 28, 2011

Western Political Science Association 2011 Annual Meeting Paper

Proponents of ideals of 'public reason' often claim that the special restrictions they place on the justification of political principles are motivated by the need to avoid illegitimate coercion. On this view, the requirement that political action be 'publicly justified' is a condition for justified coercion. This paper challenges this orthodoxy as confused. It also suggests an alternative rationale for the public justification requirement. Instead of focusing on the possible victims of coercion, my alternative stresses the status of citizens as co-authors of decisions taken in their joint name. Among other advantages, I argue that this approach allows ideals of public reason to respond better to the charge that it is problematically exclusionary in its bracketing of certain sorts of reasons (religious, perfectionist, etc.) in political argument.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 22, 2011 ; Last revised: March 30, 2011

Suggested Citation

Bird, Colin, Coercion and Public Justification (March 28, 2011). Western Political Science Association 2011 Annual Meeting Paper . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1767009

Contact Information

Colin Bird (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,162
Downloads: 162
Download Rank: 145,387