Footnotes (69)



Tort in Three Dimensions

John C. P. Goldberg

Harvard Law School

February 22, 2011

Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 38, 2011

Should our tort law serve as a model for other nations? The answer depends in part on what one understands it to be. Since the mid-Twentieth Century, progressives have favored 'thin' accounts that treat tort law as having but two dimensions: forum and function. Tort, they say, provides a general forum for grievances and, by doing so, performs certain governmental functions, such as deterrence of anti-social conduct, compensation of injury victims, and the bringing to light of abuses of power.

Progressives have favored thin accounts mainly because those accounts emphasize the extent to which tort law enables courts to achieve social goods. Unfortunately, the very thinness of progressive accounts has left tort law highly vulnerable to the conservative criticism that tort is an irrational and illegitimate mode of regulation. As a result, tort law today tends to comes off as an unstable, unprincipled combination of certain plaintiff-friendly features that are said to serve salutary regulatory objectives and certain defendant-friendly features that are said to be necessary to ward off undesirable regulation.

In fact, tort law’s "bipolar" appearance is an unfortunate byproduct of the inadequacies of two-dimensional accounts, whether progressive or conservative. Simply put, tort will inevitably appear arbitrary and mysterious until one appreciates its third dimension – its fill, or substance. Seen in "3D," tort law emerges as a relatively coherent body of law, yet still one that progressives have reason to embrace. Indeed, with tort law in full view, one might even believe that it can profitably be emulated elsewhere.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Fill, Forum, Function, Litigation, Three-Dimensional, Tort, Tort Reform

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 23, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Goldberg, John C. P., Tort in Three Dimensions (February 22, 2011). Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 38, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1767362

Contact Information

John C. P. Goldberg (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
Areeda 232
1545 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-2086 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 713
Downloads: 141
Download Rank: 163,614
Footnotes:  69