Options for Returning the Value of CO2 Emissions Allowances to Households
Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 11-03
44 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2011
Date Written: February 22, 2011
This paper examines alternative ways that the value of CO2 emissions allowances created under cap-and-trade policy could be returned to households. One approach (based on principles of economic efficiency) is effectively a "tax shift" that would use revenues from an auction of CO2 emissions allowances to reduce preexisting distortionary taxes. A second approach (based on principles of property rights for common-pool resources), known as cap-and-dividend, would refund allowance value as equal lump-sum cash transfers to households. Economic theory suggests (with some caveats) that a tax shift would be considerably less costly to the overall economy. In contrast, cap-and-dividend provides ample compensation for low-income households, though it appears to be more costly than other approaches, including perhaps well-designed regulatory policies. A dividend approach might be combined with other policies to provide incentives for households to invest in energy-efficient technologies and thereby lower the costs of the carbon policy.
Keywords: cap-and-trade, auction tax shift, revenue recycling, tax interaction, dividends
JEL Classification: H23, Q54, Q58
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
How Should Heavy-Duty Trucks Be Taxed?
How Much Should Highway Fuels Be Taxed?
What are the Costs of Meeting Distributional Objectives for Climate Policy?
What are the Costs of Meeting Distributional Objectives in Designing Domestic Climate Policy?
Allowance Allocation in a CO2 Emissions Cap-and-Trade Program for the Electricity Sector in California
By Karen L. Palmer, Dallas Burtraw, ...
Moving U.S. Climate Policy Forward: Are Carbon Taxes the Only Good Alternative?