Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1772725
 
 

Footnotes (223)



 


 



The Overused and Under-Defined Notion of 'Material' in Securities Law


Dale A. Oesterle


Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

February 28, 2011

Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 145

Abstract:     
Core doctrine in federal securities law rests on a single word - "material." Federal statutes and agency anti-fraud rules and disclosure requirements contain the term as an essential qualifier and identifier. "Facts" or "information" must be "material" before a legal obligation to disclose attaches. In other words, the term material has an unrivaled position in the center of all of securities law and agency rules and court decisions applying the term necessarily establish the fundamental scope and bite of securities regulation. A study of close to eight hundred cases in which a federal court’s applies the term to specific facts, however, finds that the case-law is, well, quixotic at best and fickle at worst. An argument on the proper breakdown of the cases is begun here.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 2, 2011 ; Last revised: June 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Oesterle, Dale A., The Overused and Under-Defined Notion of 'Material' in Securities Law (February 28, 2011). Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 145. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1772725 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1772725

Contact Information

Dale A. Oesterle (Contact Author)
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,721
Downloads: 235
Download Rank: 99,968
Footnotes:  223