Convincing Elites, Controlling Elites

Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 54, pp. 175-211, 2011

Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-09

38 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2011 Last revised: 9 Mar 2011

Douglas NeJaime

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2011

Abstract

Within the legal mobilization framework, sociolegal scholars identify elite support as a key indirect benefit of litigation. Court-centered strategies generate support from influential state and private actors, and this support helps a movement to achieve its goals. Instead of assuming elite support to be a decidedly positive step in a movement’s trajectory, a more contextual analysis situates elite support as a complex, dynamic factor that movement advocates attempt to manage. Such support may at times create political and legal risks that jeopardize a movement’s progress. My analysis of the marriage equality movement suggests a tentative typology with which to approach elite support: Elite support appears generally productive for a movement when it leads to action consistent with the movement’s strategy. On the other hand, elite support may pose significant risk when it prompts action inconsistent with the movement’s strategic plan, even if it is consistent with the movement’s substantive positions.

Keywords: Legal Mobilization, Same-Sex Marriage, Marriage Equality, Social Movements, Elite Support, Cause Lawyering

Suggested Citation

NeJaime, Douglas, Convincing Elites, Controlling Elites (March 1, 2011). Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 54, pp. 175-211, 2011; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1778523

Douglas NeJaime (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Rank
316,501
Abstract Views
1,100