Public Use in the Dirigiste Tradition: Private and Public Benefit in an Era of Agglomeration

77 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2011  

Steven J. Eagle

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

Date Written: March 8, 2011

Abstract

This article analyzes the development of eminent domain law, focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals’ approach to the requirement that takings be for “public use.” It asserts that the Supreme Court’s public use doctrine is conceptually incomplete. In applying that doctrine and its own precedents, the Court of Appeals acts in the State’s tradition of dirigisme, and subordinates constitutional protections for private property to centralized development. Its recent Goldstein and Kaur opinions, uncritically supporting development for economic agglomeration, are the culmination of this approach.

The article also discusses implications for public policy arising from condemnation for transfer for private redevelopment, as hastened by government efforts to stimulate agglomeration. These include a lack of transparency, secondary rent seeking, possibilities of corruption resulting from of crony capitalism, and the inefficient use of public and private recourses.

Keywords: Alexander Hamilton, Atlantic Yards, Blight, Cannata, Charles Breitel, Control, DeWitt Clinton, Direction, Fifth Amendment, Hamilton Bank, Iqbal, Kelo v. City of New London, Penn Central, Pretextuality, Prevention of Harm, Seward, Thomas Roberts, Twombly, Urban Revitalization, Williamson County

JEL Classification: H80, K11, P11, P14, R52, R58

Suggested Citation

Eagle, Steven J., Public Use in the Dirigiste Tradition: Private and Public Benefit in an Era of Agglomeration (March 8, 2011). Fordham Urban Law Journal, Forthcoming; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 11-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1781180

Steven J. Eagle (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
68
Rank
280,839
Abstract Views
1,078