The Legal Profession as Gatekeeper to the Judiciary: Design Faults in Measures to Enhance Diversity
27 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2011
Date Written: March 4, 2011
Abstract
The gate-keeping role played by the legal profession in the judicial appointments process gives rise to the translation of entrenched group-based identity hierarchies from legal practice into the judiciary. The relationship between the composition of the legal profession and the judiciary has been almost completely unaffected by recent reforms designed to increase diversity in the composition of the judiciary. This article identifies legal and institutional defects which help to explain the failure to disrupt the reproduction of these patterns of appointment. We identify two particular defects which we call soft target radicalism and regulatory bind as important factors inhibiting change. We conclude that if the legal profession is to retain its gate-keeping role, equality law which directly regulates legal practice should be strengthened and the regulatory binds in which the Judicial Appointments Commission and other public entities are caught should be loosened.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Trials of Strength: The Reconfiguration of Litigation as a Contested Terrain
By Andrew Boon and John Flood
-
Reconfiguring the Market for Advocacy Services A Case Study of London and Four Fields of Practice
By John Flood, Andrew Boon, ...
-
By Wesley Pue