19 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2011
Date Written: March 4, 2011
In cases concerning indirect religious discrimination the claimant must demonstrate that an otherwise neutral measure has caused her to suffer a particular disadvantage because of her religion. In Eweida v British Airways the Court of Appeal held that personal religious beliefs which are not part of official religious dogma cannot be relied upon as the basis for a claim of indirect discrimination. I discuss, first, the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Eweida; then I examine the way personal religious beliefs have been treated in other cases in Britain and in the United States; finally, I place the issue in a wider human rights framework.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hatzis, Nicholas, Personal Religious Beliefs in the Workplace: How Not to Define Indirect Discrimination (March 4, 2011). The Modern Law Review, Vol. 74, Issue 2, pp. 287-305, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1781579 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00847.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: j-2230.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.