Footnotes (300)



Reconsidering the Separation of Banking and Commerce

Mehrsa Baradaran

University of Georgia School of Law

March 1, 2011

George Washington Law Review, Vol. 80, p. 385, 2012

This Article examines the long-held belief that banking and commerce need to be kept separate in order to ensure a stable banking system. Specifically, the Article criticizes the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA), which prohibits non-banking entities from owning banks. The recent banking collapse has caused and exacerbated several problematic trends in U.S. banking, especially the conglomeration of banking entities and the homogenization of assets. The inflexible and outdated provisions of the BHCA are a major cause of this movement toward conglomeration and homogenization. Since the enactment of the BHCA, the landscape of U.S. banking has changed dramatically. The strict separation of commerce and banking embodied in the BHCA does not reflect these changes. This article argues that allowing commercial firms to own banks could lead to a more diversified and less risk-prone financial structure, and gives examples of possible changes and potential ownership structures that could reduce risks in the financial system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: Banking, Finance, Corporations

JEL Classification: G21, G28

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 13, 2011 ; Last revised: September 29, 2015

Suggested Citation

Baradaran, Mehrsa, Reconsidering the Separation of Banking and Commerce (March 1, 2011). George Washington Law Review, Vol. 80, p. 385, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1783029

Contact Information

Mehrsa Baradaran (Contact Author)
University of Georgia School of Law ( email )
225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States
646-382-2632 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,969
Downloads: 251
Download Rank: 95,521
Footnotes:  300