Juvenile Justice in Flux

Christopher Slobogin

Vanderbilt University - Law School

Mark R. Fondacaro, J.D., Ph.D.

John Jay College - CUNY

March 14, 2011

Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 11-12
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-17

The current approach to the juvenile crime problem is insufficiently conceptualized and too beholden to myths about youth, the crimes they commit, and effective means of responding to their problems. The currently dominant punitive approach to juvenile justice, modeled on the adult criminal justice system, either ignores or misapplies current knowledge about the causes of juvenile crime and the means of reducing it. We argue that, with some significant adjustments that take this new knowledge into account, the legal system should continue to maintain a separate juvenile court, but one that is preventive in orientation, with a new emphasis on both rehabilitation and flexible procedures. The view that culpability should be the linchpin of juvenile justice (touted by liberals as well as conservatives) is misguided, not only because it leads to unnecessarily harsh punishment but also because it deemphasizes crime-reducing interventions and undermines the case for handling adolescent offenders through a system that is independent of the culpability-based adult system. The currently popular view that adult-type procedures should govern the juvenile process is also open to serious doubt, given social science research that questions the extent to which such procedures promote accuracy and fairness. Chapter 1, which elaborates on the book’s thesis, is provided here.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: juvenile justice, retribution, rehabilitation, juvenile due process, neuroscience, risk assessment and management, Hendricks, Gault

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 14, 2011 ; Last revised: March 21, 2011

Suggested Citation

Slobogin, Christopher and Fondacaro, J.D., Ph.D., Mark R., Juvenile Justice in Flux (March 14, 2011). JUVENILES AT RISK: A PLEA FOR PREVENTIVE JUSTICE, Oxford University Press, Forthcoming; Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 11-12; Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1783921

Contact Information

Christopher Slobogin (Contact Author)
Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States

Mark Robert Fondacaro
John Jay College - CUNY ( email )
445 W. 59th St.
New York, NY 10019
United States
6465574503 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 890
Downloads: 164
Download Rank: 143,973