Does Stated Purchasing Behavior Predict Actual Behavior?
37 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2011
Date Written: December 16, 2010
Abstract
This paper studies the extent to which the stated behavior of a household predicts the same household’s actual shopping choices with respect to products that carry Environmental and Ethical (EE) labels. The analysis uses three years of household panel data on retail coffee purchases in Sweden. A central feature of the data is that households submit a questionnaire annually, indicating whether they try as much as possible to buy EE-labeled products. Consumers are indeed more likely to buy EE-labeled products if they say they do, and less likely to if they say they don’t. However, even the strongest self-declared EE-label consumers primarily purchase conventional coffee. Based on shopping choices in the field, these same consumers would be willing to pay premiums for EE-label coffee that are significantly higher than the implicit price for these labels. The results indicate that the narrow range of organic and Fairtrade coffee is an important explanation for the divergence between stated and actual behavior.
Keywords: Hypothetical bias, stated preferences, revealed preferences, consumer scan panel, eco-labeling
JEL Classification: Q51, M31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
0 References
0 Citations
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism?
By James J. Murphy, Thomas Stevens, ...
-
Earned Wealth, Engaged Bidders? Evidence from a Second Price Auction
By Nicolas Jacquemet, Bobert-vincent Joulé, ...
-
By James J. Murphy, Thomas Stevens, ...
-
Do People Always Pay Less than They Say? Testbed Laboratory Experiments with IV and HG Values
By Nicolas Jacquemet, Bobert-vincent Joulé, ...
-
By Glenn C. Blomquist, Karen Blumenschein, ...
-
By Nicolas Jacquemet, Alexander G. James, ...
-
By Laura Nistor
-
By Nicolas Jacquemet, Alexander G. James, ...
-
What Drives Failure to Maximize Payoffs in the Lab? A Test of the Inequality Aversion Hypothesis