Management Science 60 (April, 2014), 888-902
45 Pages Posted: 15 Mar 2011 Last revised: 2 Aug 2017
Date Written: June 5, 2013
We test whether the well-documented high returns of private equity sponsors result from wealth transfers from other financial claimants and counterparties and from a focus on short-term profits at the expense of long-term value. Debt investors who finance buyouts, as well as buyers of private equity portfolio companies, represent the two potential sources of wealth transfers. Yet, we find that on average, public companies benefit when they buy financial sponsors’ portfolio companies, experiencing positive abnormal returns upon the announcement of the acquisition and long-run post-transaction abnormal returns indistinguishable from zero. We further find that large portfolio company payouts to private equity on average have no relation to future portfolio company distress, suggesting that debt investors are not suffering systematic wealth losses, either. However, we find some evidence of wealth transfers from both strategic buyers and debt investors in some special situations. Finally, we find that portfolio companies invest no differently than a matched sample of public control firms, even when they are not profitable, an observation inconsistent with short-termism.
Keywords: private equity, leveraged buyouts, disclosure policy, investment policy
JEL Classification: G31, G32, G34, L14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Harford, Jarrad and Kolasinski, Adam C., Do Private Equity Sponsor Returns Result from Wealth Transfers and Short-Termism? Evidence from a Comprehensive Sample of Large Buyouts and Exit Outcomes (June 5, 2013). Management Science 60 (April, 2014), 888-902. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1785927 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1785927