Was Jesus Running Wild? Judicial Activism or Blasphemy, Christ and the Law in Saint Augustine and Saint Thomas

International Journal of Private Law, No. 4, 2011

26 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2011 Last revised: 8 Apr 2011

See all articles by Filippo Fontanelli

Filippo Fontanelli

University of Edinburgh - School of Law

Date Written: March 15, 2011

Abstract

It has been authoritatively demonstrated that Jesus' teachings were at basis of the imputation of blasphemy that the Sanhedrin charged him with, in that he appeared to order his followers to disregard the Law. In their defense of Jesus' role as a teacher of the Law, St. Augustine and St. Thomas strived to reject this reading, resorting to the distinction between law-making and interpretation of the law. This approach is a common place in modern legal studies, and through an assessment of the current debate on judicial activism in certain areas of international law it is possible – in retrospect – to reframe and appreciate Augustine and Thomas' effort, as well as to more fully understand the historical and legal profile of Jesus' indictment.

Keywords: Jesus, judicial activism, WTO, incomplete contract, Saint Thomas, Saint Augustine, Mosaic Law

Suggested Citation

Fontanelli, Filippo, Was Jesus Running Wild? Judicial Activism or Blasphemy, Christ and the Law in Saint Augustine and Saint Thomas (March 15, 2011). International Journal of Private Law, No. 4, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1786969

Filippo Fontanelli (Contact Author)

University of Edinburgh - School of Law ( email )

Old College
South Bridge
Edinburgh, EH8 9YL
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
177
Abstract Views
1,004
rank
191,076
PlumX Metrics