The Statute of Frauds

1 Pages Posted: 23 Mar 2011

See all articles by Roger Bernhardt

Roger Bernhardt

Golden Gate University - School of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2007

Abstract

This article discusses the California Supreme Court case Sterling v. Taylor which held that extrinsic evidence may be admitted to support a claim that the Statute of Frauds has been met. When a writing is not sufficient, the attorney must not only decide whether there is sufficient supporting evidence to get past the Statute of Frauds, but also whether that evidence is sufficiently consistent with the writing.

Keywords: Sterling v. Taylor, Extrinsic Evidence, Signature

JEL Classification: K11

Suggested Citation

Bernhardt, Roger, The Statute of Frauds (March 1, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1789262 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1789262

Roger Bernhardt (Contact Author)

Golden Gate University - School of Law ( email )

536 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
5
Abstract Views
60
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information