Footnotes (155)



Traynor (Drennan) v. Hand (Baird): Much Ado About (Almost) Nothing

Victor P. Goldberg

Columbia Law School

March 25, 2011

Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 397

Most Contracts casebooks feature either Baird v. Gimbel or (Drennan v. Star Paving to illustrate the limits on revocability of an offer. In this paper an analysis of the case law yields three major conclusions. First, as is generally known, in the contractor-subcontractor cases Drennan has prevailed. However, both it and its spawn, Restatement 2d 87(2), have had almost no impact outside that narrow area. Moreover, almost all the cases involve public construction projects - private projects account for only about ten percent of the cases. This suggests that private parties have managed to resolve the problem contractually. Public contract law is encrusted with regulations, which courts and contracts scholars have ignored. The result is a peculiar phenomenon - a supposedly general contract doctrine that applies only in a specific context, but which ignores the features of that context.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Goldberg, Victor P., Traynor (Drennan) v. Hand (Baird): Much Ado About (Almost) Nothing (March 25, 2011). Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 397. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1795322 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1795322

Contact Information

Victor Paul Goldberg (Contact Author)
Columbia Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
212-854-8380 (Phone)
212-854-0221 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 893
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 206,056
Footnotes:  155
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper