Competition in the New Jersey Communications Market: Implications for Reform

26 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2011

See all articles by Jeffrey A. Eisenach

Jeffrey A. Eisenach

NERA Economic Consulting; American Enterprise Institute

Date Written: March 25, 2011


In general, economists agree that public-utility-style regulation is not only unnecessary but undesirable in competitive markets, where it inevitably distorts prices, slows innovation, discourages entry, and reduces consumer welfare. Thus, once competition develops in an industry, the appropriate policy response is to reduce regulation and allow consumers to benefit from the forces of competition.

This study examines telecommunications competition in the state of New Jersey, and concludes that competition has developed to the point where the regulatory reforms being considered by the state legislature would benefit consumers.

Other states, including California, Virginia, Indiana, Rhode Island and many others, have already reformed telecommunications regulation. Dire predictions that such reforms would lead to higher prices and other problems have not been borne out by experience. To the contrary, the results have been overwhelmingly positive, with higher rates of deployment of advanced services (especially in rural areas), increased rates of investment, and significant job creation.

Suggested Citation

Eisenach, Jeffrey A., Competition in the New Jersey Communications Market: Implications for Reform (March 25, 2011). Available at SSRN: or

Jeffrey A. Eisenach (Contact Author)

NERA Economic Consulting

1255 23rd Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20037
United States
202-448-9029 (Phone)
202-466-3605 (Fax)


American Enterprise Institute ( email )

1150 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics