Footnotes (386)




Susan W. Brenner

University of Dayton - School of Law

February 24, 2010

University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Vol. 2011, No. 1, 2010

This article analyzes the use of nanotechnology to commit crimes. A great deal has been written about the societal implications of nanotechnology, and what has been often notes that criminals will exploit the technology for antisocial ends. But while many clearly believe the technology has the capacity for a dark side, no one has focused on how that dark side might manifest itself and on the legal issues the misuse of nanotechnology may generate. This article undertakes both tasks.

It begins with the premise that nanotechnology - like computer technology - is likely to be a profoundly transformative technology. It explains why nanotechnology is likely to have wide-ranging effects across various sectors of society and speculates that nanocrime may evolve in a fashion analogous to computer crime. The article then analyzes how nanotechnology might be used to commit crimes of various types and argues that if and when nanocrime emerges, we should not respond - as we did to computer crime - by adopting technologically specific criminal statutes. Instead, we should, insofar as possible, integrate nanocrime into existing criminal law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: nanotechnology, nanobots, nanocrime, crime, criminal law, technology, implanted

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K39, K42

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 29, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Brenner, Susan W., Nanocrime? (February 24, 2010). University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Vol. 2011, No. 1, 2010 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1797082

Contact Information

Susan W. Brenner (Contact Author)
University of Dayton - School of Law ( email )
300 College Park
Dayton, OH 45469
United States
937-229-2929 (Phone)
937-229-2469 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,690
Downloads: 160
Download Rank: 146,955
Footnotes:  386
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper