Excess-Pay Clawbacks
Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 36, pp. 722-751, 2011
31 Pages Posted: 5 Jul 2011 Last revised: 1 Aug 2011
Date Written: March 28, 2011
Abstract
We explain why firms should have a policy requiring directors to recover “excess pay” – payouts to executives resulting from an error in compensation metrics (such as inflated earnings). We then analyze the clawback policies voluntarily adopted by S&P 500 firms as of 2010 and find that only a small fraction had such a policy. Our findings suggest that the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires firms to adopt a clawback policy for certain types of excess pay, will improve compensation arrangements at most firms. We also suggest how the types of excess pay not reached by Dodd-Frank should be addressed.
Keywords: Dodd-Frank, Clawback, Executive Compensation, Bonuses, Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Manipulation, Managerial Power, Sarbanes Oxley
JEL Classification: G18, G28, G34, G38, J33, K22, M52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effects of Firm-Initiated Clawback Provisions on Earnings Quality and Auditor Behavior
By Lilian H. Chan, Kevin C. W. Chen, ...
-
Recovering Bonuses After Restated Financials: Adopting Clawback Provisions
By Noel D. Addy, Xiaoyan Chu, ...
-
Does Voluntary Adoption of a Clawback Provision Improve Financial Reporting Quality?
By Ed Dehaan, Frank D. Hodge, ...
-
The Relative Efficiency of Clawback Provisions in Compensation Contracts
-
By Miriam A. Cherry and Jarrod Wong
-
By Paquita Y. Davis-friday, Abraham N. Fried, ...
-
By Ilona Babenko, Benjamin Bennett, ...
-
The Costs and Benefits of Clawback Provisions in CEO Compensation
By Mark A. Chen, Daniel Greene, ...