Michigan v. Bryant: The Counter-Revolution Begins

40 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2011

See all articles by Kenneth W. Graham

Kenneth W. Graham

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: March 29, 2011


Ever since the majority of the Supreme Court, in Crawford v. Washington took the power to determine the reliability of hearsay statements out of the hands of judges and transferred it to the jury, prosecutors and their allies have tried to chip away at Crawford – even asking the Court to overrule Crawford. In 2011, in Michigan v. Bryant, five Harvard elitists gave the prosecutors what wanted they wanted, surreptitiously overruling Crawford.

This article takes a first crack at unpacking the thirteen-factor Bryant test. Using the opinions of the majority and Justice Scalia’s outraged dissent, as well as the briefs and oral argument, it addresses a few of the issues that lower courts will face in attempting to make sense of a decision that rests more on bogus history and (as Justice Scalia says) the personal preferences of the judges than on any historically-sound policy.

Keywords: Crawford, Davis, Hammon, Scalia, Confrontation, Cross-Examination, Hearsay, Excited Utterances, Emergency Doctrine, Sixth Amendment

Suggested Citation

Graham, Kenneth W., Michigan v. Bryant: The Counter-Revolution Begins (March 29, 2011). UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 11-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1798877

Kenneth W. Graham (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics