Managing Moral Risk: The Case of Contract

Aditi Bagchi

Fordham University School of Law

Columbia Law Review, Vol. 111, p. 1878, 2011
U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 11-11

The concept of moral luck describes how the moral character of our actions seems to depend on factors outside our control. Implications of moral luck have been extensively explored in criminal law and tort law, but there is no literature on moral luck in contract law. I show that contract is an especially illuminating domain for the study of moral luck because it highlights that moral luck is not just a dark cloud over morality and the law to bemoan or ignore. We anticipate moral luck, i.e., we manage our moral risk, when we take into account the possibility that our actions might result in serious harm to others for which we would be morally responsible, and adjust our conduct accordingly. Moral risk is present in contract both at the stage of contract formation and, later, when we must decide whether to breach or whether to accommodate a request for modification. We negotiate these risks both through collective background institutions that limit the harms we can inflict on others and through the rules of contract law itself, which align our material and moral interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: Contracts, formation, performance, misfortune, breach, risk, outcome responsibility, moral responsibility, culpability, inequality, modification

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 31, 2011 ; Last revised: January 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Bagchi, Aditi, Managing Moral Risk: The Case of Contract. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 111, p. 1878, 2011; U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 11-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1799386

Contact Information

Aditi Bagchi (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,800
Downloads: 337
Download Rank: 68,984
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper