Transaction Costs and International Litigation
Australian Law Journal, Vol. 80, p. 438, 2006
56 Pages Posted: 5 Apr 2011
Date Written: May 2, 2006
Abstract
The multifaceted process of globalisation has dramatically expanded international trade and investment and increased the frequency of cross border legal disputes. The volume of international litigation will continue to expand, despite the high level of risk, cost and delay that is involved. The transaction costs involved in the enforcement of the legal rights and obligations arising from international trade, investment and commerce operate as a non-tariff trade barrier. This paper argues that minimising these transaction costs is a significant, but unresolved, concomitant of the successful micro-economic reform achieved through bilateral trade agreements. In areas such as cross-border insolvency, international asset freezing orders, forum or venue disputation, transnational evidence collection, service of process and the enforcement of foreign judgements, there is scope for international cooperation between judicial officers to reduce the costs to litigants. The further reduction in the trade barriers that arise by reason of the costs of international dispute resolution may need to be addressed in trade negotiations.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Asia-Pacific Regional Architecture and Consumer Product Safety Regulation for a Post-FTA Era
-
By Luke R. Nottage and Souichirou Kozuka
-
Translating Tanase: Challenging Paradigms of Japanese Law and Society
-
Product Safety Regulation Reform in Australia and Japan: Harmonising Towards European Models?
-
Western Ideology, Japanese Product Safety Regulation and International Trade
By S. David Cohen and Karen Martin
-
Responsive Regulation and Comparative Consumer Product Safety